The release of the Senate’s
report on U.S. sanctioned torture prompts me to post this article that I wrote
for Tikkun magazine some years ago:
THE 8TH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS CRUEL AND
UNUSUAL punishment. Thanks to the founders (and especially to James Madison,
who conjured the Bill of Rights), U.S. citizens need not fear judicially
sanctioned impalements or being drawn-and-quartered in the public square ... at
least not yet.
The framers were especially sensitive to the issue of
torture, since they were living in its shadow. Benjamin Franklin was born in
1706-just fourteen years after the trials at Salem, where for the crime of
refusing to plead either "guilty" or "not guilty" to the
charge of witchcraft, one of the accused, Giles Cory, had been crushed to death
beneath a series of increasingly heavy stones, dying slowly over the course of
two days.
So if the founders were careful to build into our legal
framework safeguards against self-incrimination, as well as the rights to
confront one's accusers in open court, counsel, jury trial, and protection from
being burned alive or torn apart on the rack, it was for good reason. The Dark
Ages were not so far in the past.
Humane treatment of prisoners has deep roots in the
United States, especially in wartime. During the War for Independence, enlisted
men or captives lacking ransom value were frequently killed without tribunal on
the field--regarded as the equivalent of insurgents by the English, who didn't
recognize America as a sovereign nation or its soldiers as lawful adversaries.
After capturing a thousand Hessian mercenaries at the battle of Trenton, George
Washington vowed to behave better than the enemy and ordered his subordinates,
"Treat them with humanity, and let them have no reason to Complain of our
Copying the brutal example of the British Army," who were notorious for
maltreating POWs aboard their prison ships, where more Americans died than on
the battlefields.
The following year, John Adams, as chair of the Board of
War and Ordnance, complained of hearing "continual accounts of the
barbarities, the cruel murders in cold blood, even by the most tormenting ways
of starving and freezing, committed by our enemies"--reports that left him
harrowed. Adams abhorred every form of cruelty, even toward animals and still
more toward defenseless inmates. The British excused their abuse as a matter of
military policy. But in a letter to his wife Abigail, Adams resolved to
exercise "Yankee virtue" toward prisoners in American hands.
"Piety, humanity and honesty are the best policy," he advised.
What would the founders say of George Bush, whose contention
that he can strip any citizen of constitutional protections, simply by the
executive fiat of designating them enemy combatants, has now been overruled by
the courts? As Madison wrote in the Federalist No. 47, "The accumulation
of all powers, legislative, executive, and Federalist judiciary, in the same
hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed,
or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
Despite the President's insistence that our country
"doesn't torture," hundreds held in Iraq, Afghanistan and at
Guantanamo have died or been abused in U.S. custody, with fresh revelations
pouring forth. Typical was the testimony of Murat Kurnaz, a former Gitmo
inmate, who told Congress in May of 2008 not only of being punched in the
stomach while his head was held under water, but also being shackled by his
arms to the ceiling of an airplane hangar, shocked with electric prods, and
subjected to temperature extremes. The ends--gathering information--are said to
justify the means.
That's what the authorities argued in Massachusetts, when
Giles Cory was crushed. Around 1688, children near the town of Boston began
behaving strangely, experiencing fits. A respected physician concluded that
"nothing but an hellish Witchcraft could be the Original of these
Maladies." Then, as now, extreme measures were needed to resist the plague
and, naturally, confessions flowed under duress. The finger-pointing didn't end
until the judges themselves were in danger of going to the gallows.
Torture produces falsehoods--from consorting in midnight
covens to participation in terrorist plots. And if Americans resort to
thumbscrews, what's to stop our foes from doing likewise? As revolutionary
patriot Thomas Paine reasoned in his Dissertation on First Principles of
Government, "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his
enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent
that will reach to himself."
The founding fathers' opposition to torture became
established military doctrine under Abraham Lincoln, who in 1863 signed the
first articles codifying the laws of war. The 157 rules contained in Lincoln's
"General Orders No. 100" were crafted by the legal scholar Francis
Lieber of Columbia University. With two sons in Union ranks and his eldest boy
enlisted in the South, Lieber wanted to ensure decent treatment for detainees,
whatever their uniform. So Article 16 of what became known as the Lieber Code
affirmed that "Military necessity does not admit of cruelty--that is, the
infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering or for revenge, nor of
maiming or wounding except in fight, nor of torture to extort
confessions." Lincoln's enlightened policy became a model for other
European nations and ultimately for the Geneva Conventions.
Toward the end of his life, Thomas Jefferson predicted
the dawn of a more civilized age, envisioning a generation "as much wiser
than we have been as we than our fathers were, and they than the burners of
witches." How can we even be debating the propriety of torture in this
day? The question that ought to be discussed is, who should be held
accountable? In a message to the nation delivered during the War of 1812,
President Madison called torture an "outrage against the laws of honorable
war and against the feelings sacred to humanity." Our history has been
hijacked--the latest case of extraordinary rendition.
1 comment:
I do believe that our Enlightened forefathers from the core Founding Fathers through to Lincoln would weep today at our extensive (almost 80% of population?) embrace of dogmatic and fundamentalist Christianity while so rapidly "losing our soul" in the decline of our spirituality.
Since the inception of Man from theme point of developing Intelligence and Consciousness, Man has evolved physically and mentally, with exceptional evolutionary increases in technology. Yet with the exception of exceedingly brief periods of Enlightenment, our increased evolution spirituality has been very poor, often going through time periods of "reversed evolution".
It is a shame.
Post a Comment